tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-48290097909120197482024-03-14T00:15:59.568-07:00unlawful arrest and detentionAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-92188247633611585122013-06-15T17:19:00.004-07:002013-06-15T17:19:38.199-07:00South Sudan: unlawful arrests, detention catastrophic conditionsOnly speedy reforms can end plight of prisoners<br />
<br />
Enlarge<br />
Inmates at a prison in Bentiu, Unity State. In November 2011, 93% of the prison population were male, 30% were in custody.<br />
<br />
South Sudan: Unlawful Detention and Dire Conditions<br />
"What do prisoners in South Sudan reveals serious problems in the nascent justice system. South Sudan is a new country. He desperately needs a functioning legal system that protects human rights and the dignity of the individual. This is the basis for the rule of law and accountability. "<br />
Daniel Bekele, director of the Africa division of Human Rights Watch<br />
(Juba) - Unfair trials, unlawful imprisonment and catastrophic conditions in South Sudan prisons show that the young state urgently needs to reform its justice system, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
The 105-page report, "Prison Is Not for Me: Unlawful Detention in South Sudan" documents the violation of procedural rights, systematic and unlawful detention and harsh prison conditions unacceptable. It is based on studies in a ten-month period before and after the independence of South Sudan on 9 July 2011.<br />
<br />
"What do prisoners in South Sudan reveals serious problems in the nascent judicial system," said Daniel Bekele, director of the Africa division of Human Rights Watch. "South Sudan is a new country. He desperately needs a functioning legal system that protects human rights and the dignity of the individual. This is the basis for the rule of law and accountability. "<br />
<br />
Were examined 12 of the 79 prisons that are located in regions with the largest numbers of prisoners. The report is based on the statements of more than 250 inmates and many judicial officers, prison guards, police officers, Staatsanwählten and traditional authorities.<br />
<br />
Countless human rights problems exist at all levels of the judicial system.<br />
<br />
A third of the 6,000 people detained in South Sudan has not been convicted. Them is not even a crime imputed to part. Nevertheless, they are a long time in jail and wait for police, prosecutors and judges work their cases.<br />
<br />
The vast majority of inmates has no legal representation because they can afford a lawyer and a functioning legal aid system exists. Judge people sentenced to long prison terms or even death, although they could not understand the charges without support. You could call any witnesses to defend themselves.<br />
<br />
Frustrated the criminal justice system and confused most of the prisoners. A male inmate who is accused of murder, says: "I'm here now for five years [...] and I have never seen a judge. The court has not been called yet the case. The Attorney General has no idea of the laws. The police do not either. "<br />
<br />
In the plural legal system of South Sudan official also exist with traditional dishes. Whether this method can guarantee the rule of law, is doubtful. Their chairmen are not legally trained and have numerous people for acts sentenced to prison terms, which are not crimes in the southern Sudanese criminal law. Although traditional dishes are partially accessible and efficient than government, but their jurisdictions do and sentencing powers are not clearly defined.<br />
<br />
Many detainees are accused of marital or sexual offenses such as adultery or secret marriage. That these facts exist in the written law and customary law, violate the internationally protected rights to privacy and be sure to select the spouses themselves. Other people are indefinitely detained because they often cattle, can not pay bills, fines or judicially determined compensation, in the form of a specified number. Most do not know when they are released.<br />
<br />
In addition, some people who are currently in detention, placed no crime to load. Others were arrested in place of relatives or friends. About 90 inmates are in prison only because, apparently because they have mental disabilities. The people of South Sudan have experienced decades of war trauma, but the country has no mental health facilities. Persons with mental impairments are quickly sent to prisons because they never receive the necessary treatment.<br />
<br />
"Many South Sudanese prisoners have fallen victim to illegal arrests and procedures. They are being held without any legal basis. Some are convicted for acts that should not be criminalized purely and simply because that engages their fundamental rights and freedoms, "said Bekele. "These arrests are unlawful under international law - that is illegal - and often also violate the Constitution and laws of South Sudan itself"<br />
<br />
Appalling prison conditions worsen the situation of those who are unjustly imprisoned. The infrastructure is rudimentary in the prisons, in some cases totally destroyed or in disarray. The cells are unhygienic, heavily overcrowded and inadequate ventilation.<br />
<br />
The prisoners do not get enough to eat, enough water in some prisons. They fall ill easily, but then rarely adequately treated if they can not pay for the drugs themselves. Ten inmates of the prison in Aweil and Bentiu in at least five of the prison alone died last year from treatable diseases.<br />
<br />
Also report inmates that prison guards often beat them with sticks or whips to punish them for infractions. Some are permanently shackled with heavy chains. This violates national and international standards for the use of force prohibited and constitutes cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments<br />
<br />
In all, Human Rights Watch visited prisons children are detained together with adults. Neither you nor adequate rehabilitation programs, educational opportunities are offered, although the South Sudan Child Act provides for both.<br />
<br />
International donors have focused on building prisons. You must also work to improve prison conditions and ensure that the facilities comply with minimum standards. Furthermore, their support is needed to procure food rations and medicines in sufficient quantity. This need is all the greater since the government in February halted oil production and export, and the budgets of all government institutions has reduced.<br />
<br />
The Department of Justice and the Interior Ministry and the Judiciary should immediately review the files of all prisoners - and are supported by international organizations and donors. You must identify illegally detained persons and all dismissed, their continued detention is not justified. Individual assessments, and better cooperation within the justice sector can help to prevent unlawful detention. This would also reduce the number of prisoners and requires no substantial issues.<br />
<br />
In addition, the South Sudan should ensure that police, prosecutors and judges continue to make enough on procedural safeguards and fair trial standards. The existing training programs are too superficial and does not address some of the problems mentioned in. The government is a functioning legal aid system must also establish. Here, too, the support of donors is required.<br />
<br />
Only far-reaching judicial and legal reforms to the detention time limit before the actual procedure, define the skills of traditional criminal courts and abolish prison sentences for adultery and default in payment of debt. Also, the detention of people who show signs of mental retardation must be terminated immediately. It is imperative that people with mental illness have access to treatment.<br />
<br />
"People who commit crimes should be convicted," says Bekele. "But detention is one of the toughest sanctions that may be imposed on a person a government. They should be applied only after a rule of law, due process, corresponding to the southern Sudanese law and international human rights obligations. "Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-39330815353063957302013-06-15T17:12:00.001-07:002013-06-15T17:12:04.291-07:00Unlawful arrest: Investigations canceledFrankfurt / Main (DAPD-hes). The unlawful arrest of environmental activists Cecile Lecomte half years ago in Giessen has no criminal consequences for the police involved. The investigation was set for information of "Company Info" as the radio station in Frankfurt / Main announced. The charge of false imprisonment can not be maintained because the police would not have known that they were acting illegally, the Giessen prosecutor is quoted.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
Lecomte was climbing up on the facade of the District Court Giessen in July 2009 and had chalked a slogan against genetic engineering on the wall. She was then arrested and had to spend a night in the cell. In contrast, Lecomte had complained before the appellate court. The judges had ruled in 2010 that the detention was unlawful.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-49659592424212139342013-06-15T17:08:00.004-07:002013-06-15T17:08:24.044-07:00Unlawful arrest - Please help in the case of Frank Droyk22, To read in September, 2011 by Honigmann<br />
The German Office for Human Rights<br />
asks for help!<br />
<br />
Facts:<br />
Frank Droyk, Kromlauer Weg 5, 02953 Gablenzgasse member of the ECB (European Central citizens) got by the consortium (also: Job Centre) alleged to have illegally obtained money.<br />
For this purpose he has spoken correctly. The consortium did not agree and now complains against him.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
The district court White water sat at the trial in September 2011.<br />
Frank Droyk has made a PSE (declaration of marital status), the writing of the membership of the ZEB, and the BMI (Federal Ministry of the Interior) attached document on 11.08.2011 and requested the legal ability to judge evidence of Mr. Ralf Rehm at the District Court.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
After a time limit of seven days, he got sent no response, no legal proof and no court date.<br />
<br />
On 19.09.2011 took place around 20.00 clock the arrest.<br />
<br />
It involved five alleged police 3 men and 2 women.<br />
Two names have fallen Rene Zaruba (not seen) (see picture) and Ms. Balko.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Reproach:<br />
<br />
He had not appeared for court date.<br />
The warrant was not signed by a judge, but only by a judicial employees.<br />
The alleged police have not identified yourself on demand.<br />
Filming our Commissioner was prohibited under threat of physical violence by a court referral.<br />
<br />
Frank Droyk was taken for identity checks because he has rightly replied that he was not Frank Droyk. You should call him Frank.<br />
<br />
On 20.09.2011, he was brought before a judge in white water and moved to Görlitz in the prison, ostensibly to wait for a court date in early October, he does not know. Thus, the testimony of his wife, which was allowed on 20.09.2011 bring him a breakfast.<br />
<br />
On 20.09.2011 our Commissioner has agreed with Mr. Dresler of the JVA: 16.00 clock an appointment to meet with Frank Droyk.<br />
And he has sent to the process and power of attorney by fax.<br />
The date was agreed and confirmed by telephone.<br />
<br />
At 16.00 clock by Andreas Schubert (Head of Prison Görlitz) was informed that the judge has pronounced Rehm of white water a ban on access.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
White Water District Court<br />
Marktplatz 1<br />
02943 White Water<br />
Phone: 03576/2847 - 0<br />
Fax: 03576/207326<br />
Monday 08.00 - 12.00 clock<br />
Tuesday 08.00 - 12.00 clock / 13:00 - 17.00 clock<br />
Thursday 08.00 - 12.00 clock / 13:00 - 15.30 clock<br />
<br />
Address for visitors:<br />
Penitentiary Görlitz<br />
Post number 18<br />
02826 Görlitz<br />
<br />
Postal Address:<br />
Penitentiary Görlitz<br />
PO Box 300261<br />
02807 Görlitz<br />
Telephone: (+49) (03581) 46 23 00<br />
Fax: (+49) (03581) 46 24 17<br />
poststelle@jvagr.justiz.sachen.de<br />
<br />
Head of the Penitentiary:<br />
Government Director Frank Hiekel<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Deputy Head of Mission:<br />
Government Oberamtsrat Frank Rieger<br />
<br />
Ask for the release.<br />
Send by fax, mail, or call there.<br />
<br />
Additional documentation will follow soon.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-91764993436551713022012-10-15T01:10:00.002-07:002012-10-15T01:10:14.528-07:00Unlawful arrest Bergstedts employs Diet<br />
Giessen (MOE). The unlawful arrest of political activists Reiskirchener Joerg Bergstedt in the summer of 2006 in Giessen employs the state legislature. After release of the SPD parliamentary deputies Nancy Faeser there since the beginning of October a report request of their party in the matter, which has not yet been answered. Faeser criticized the "Reluctance," the Interior Ministry in investigating the backgrounds of that police action.<br />
Flashback: The founder of Saasener project workshop was on the night of the 14th May of 2006 was arrested as he was bicycling home from casting to Saasen. The police made him responsible for graffiti on a house and property damage the CDU district office in Spenerweg. And because he assumed that he would commit further offenses, he stayed four days in Vorbeugegewahrsam. It later emerged: Bergstedt it could not have been, because of the self-styled professional revolutionary played simultaneously with a like-minded badminton before the district court at the Ostanlage and cycled after them Saasen direction. Documented, <br />
<a name='more'></a>the steps of the "fun guerrilla" that night because a mobile police squad that cares otherwise rather serious criminals like kidnappers, Bergstedt and Co. under surveillance. Against his detention, which confirmed the Giessen district court a few days later, Bergstedt appealed to the higher court a notice of appeal - and succeeded. The decision of the Court of Appeal to declare the detention unlawful made in June 2007 for a stir because the OLG - with reference to the practice in the Third Reich - warned against misuse of the Hessian Police Act enshrined eliminate detention toward a protective custody.<br />
<br />
The case remained nationwide long time unnoticed. Not until the end of August this year, after the "Frankfurter Rundschau" (FR) immediately prior to the election of Interior Minister Volker Bouffier (CDU) as prime minister full-page "under the heading enemies for life," a man's enmity between the Minister of casting and political activists from Saasen recorded while on a "remarkably little attention scandal," wrote the opposition in Parliament was noisy, especially since the report gave the impression that Bouffier could have directly influenced the police action in that summer night in 2006.<br />
<br />
The Interior Committee of the Parliament was concerned then because of the FR-reporting on 26 August with the case of "Mr. B," as the Green MEP Jürgen Frömmrich by the then Secretary of State Boris Rhein and the then national police chief Norbert Nedela information sought.<br />
<br />
His time warned the Giessen FDP member of parliament Wolfgang Greilich the opposition before a siding Bergstedt. Greilich said, according to the minutes: "I recommend very collegial strong reticence in addressing this case, Mr B., who also now quite - it was the Minister of the Interior to do obviously anything, he was not even close - to legally been sentenced to a term of imprisonment, is because he had done serious damage to property. I recommend caution with the case. Sometime this fall back on, which means he must bring those issues up. "<br />
<br />
Frömmrich replied that he knew the person and its environment very well classified, but it is a matter that will be in those cases acted "in accordance with constitutional considerations must." Someone wrongfully imprisoning four days was, finally, "no trifle."<br />
<br />
In its press release last Thursday says the SPD representative Faeser of a "precarious situation" and immediately requested a "full investigation" by the new interior minister Rhine. Faeser: "In the interest of the police effort must be made to avoid the impression that the reasons for apparent illegal conduct veiled in the police or to be elucidated," because so far, have the police headquarters Mittelhessen can not explain how to detention. I can get, even though the police had to have known that the detainee that his alleged actions could not have committed.<br />
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-82746383769362078062012-10-15T01:08:00.002-07:002012-10-15T01:08:58.413-07:00Frank Droyk unlawful arrest case<br />
Unlawful arrest - request for help in the case of Frank Droyk<br />
<br />
The German Human Rights Office<br />
asks for your help!<br />
Facts:<br />
Frank Droyk, Kromlauer Weg 5, 02953 Gablenz member ZEB (Central European citizens), received by the consortium (also: job center) to have the charge related illegal money.<br />
For this purpose he has spoken correctly. The consortium did not agree and now complains against him.<br />
<br />
The district court set a trial white water in September 2011.<br />
Frank Droyk delivered on 11.08.2011 a PSE (declaration of marital status), the writing of the membership of the ZEB, and the BMI (Federal Ministry of the Interior) attached document and the legal capacity required to evidence of Mr. Ralf Rehm judge at the district court.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
After a deadline of 7 days there was no answer, no legal evidence and no court date sent.<br />
<br />
On 19.09.2011 around 20.00 clock was the arrest.<br />
<br />
There are 5 alleged policemen, 3 men and 2 women were involved.<br />
Two names like Rene Zaruba (see picture) and Ms. Balko (not seen).<br />
<br />
Accusation:<br />
<br />
He had not appeared for the court date.<br />
The warrant was not signed by a judge, but only by a judicial employee.<br />
The alleged police have not disclosed on request.<br />
This filming was our Commissioner, under threat of physical violence by a sending off.<br />
<br />
Frank Droyk was taken for identity checks because he has rightly responded that he was not Frank Droyk. You should call him Frank.<br />
<br />
On 20.09.2011, he was brought before the magistrate in white water and transferred to the prison in Görlitz, ostensibly to wait for a court date in early October, he does not know. Thus, the testimony of his wife that he was allowed to bring a breakfast on 20/09/2011.<br />
<br />
On 20.09.2011 our Commissioner has agreed with Mr. Dresler of the JVA for 16.00 clock an appointment to meet with Frank Droyk.<br />
And he has faxed to the process and power of attorney.<br />
The date was agreed on in advance and confirmed.<br />
<br />
At 16.00 clock of Andreas Schubert (Head JVA Görlitz) was informed that the judge has pronounced Rehm from white water an access ban.<br />
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-14726489532240282352012-10-15T01:02:00.002-07:002012-10-15T01:02:31.173-07:00Unlawful arrest: investigation set<br />
The unlawful arrest of environmental activists Cecile Lecomte half years ago in Giessen for the police officers involved no criminal penalties. The investigation was set according to information from "HR info" as the radio station in Frankfurt / Main announced. The charge of false imprisonment can not be maintained because the police would not have known that they were acting unlawfully, the prosecutor cited Giessen.<br />
<br />
Lecomte had climbed in July 2009 on the facade of the Landgericht Gießen and had chalked a slogan against GMOs on the wall. Then she was arrested and had to spend a night in the cell. However Lecomte had filed before the appellate court. The judges decided in 2010 that the arrest was unlawful.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
<br />
Award Most Helpful Answer by Asker<br />
<br />
Must a police officer, from base motives detain a passer-by who has violated the law NO?<br />
No. However, it is possible that someone just like that makes your mood. You have to remember that any deprivation of liberty, and even if only 1 second, regelmentiert strictly. This means among other things, that any deprivation of liberty must be documented and justified.<br />
<br />
The passer has the right to defend themselves against it?<br />
Against unlawful actions of state power everyone has the right to defend themselves. Whether the measures are actually illegal, but that the person should not judge better yourself but an RA so. Usually ranges from an opposition to the measure itself.<br />
<br />
Can we shoot cops in public, just as evidence?<br />
There is no fundamental "Polizeifotografierverbot", however, the police, where there is a fear that the pictures are published, confiscate the film or camera.<br />
<br />
However, the police, where there is a fear that the pictures are published, confiscate the film or camera. ><br />
I know this is partly done, but it lacks any legal basis. That's easy:<br />
<br />
Must be carried out in which cases the seizure and ensure the offenses are set out in the Code of Criminal Procedure and security in the police laws. But you will not find anywhere that film or the camera may be confiscated.<br />
<br />
<br />
The police can film or camera confiscated not just<br />
it has already been decided by the superior court that the police must. In the case concerned the seizure was conducted in response to the Police Act, because the fear was that the images should be published. Since I have no Juri account anymore, I can not tell you, unfortunately the judgment.<br />
<br />
However, this is at the police from time to time relative to public figures, where 22 KUG is ineffective, so that a publication would be possible without approval.<br />
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-16137572467720829662012-10-15T00:40:00.002-07:002012-10-15T00:40:26.866-07:00unlawful arrest of Meinl? suit fails<br />
Meinl fails in suit against referees<br />
<br />
Meinl Bank has failed in its action for damages against the appraiser Thomas Havranek, the former expert in the MEL investors affair. The reported the news magazine "profil".<br />
<br />
One of Havranek (this was later dismissed as an expert) created from the perspective of the report had led to the arrest of lawyers Meinl Julius Meinl V in 2009. The resulting damage to their image of the Bank have caused damage worth millions - was sued for damages in the amount of 10 million euros.<br />
<br />
Last Friday, the procedure was closed at the first Diet, writes "profile". "It was Julius Meinl and Meinl Bank is not possible to justify the action or conclusively to prove the damage," Havránek lawyer Andreas Rabl is quoted. The judgment in the first instance be launched in the coming weeks.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
Meinl Bank is judgment "analyze"<br />
"(...) The bank is the gegentständliche judgment - if it exists - analyze and take appropriate legal responses. It goes against common sense to assume that an unlawful pre-trial arrestsand a unique absurd deposit do no harm. (...) ", It said in a reaction against Meinl Bank wien.ORF.at.<br />
<br />
The Vorgutachten of abberufenen for bias experts Havranek had been used as the main reasons for the pre-trial detention and the "absurdly high" deposit of 100 million euros against Julius Meinl, who was unlawfully in the opinion of jurists Heinz Mayer, says the Statement of the Bank.<br />
<br />
Under investigation for years<br />
The investigations against Julius Meinl and other managers around Meinl European Land (MEL) / Meinl Bank run now for nearly five years. Havranek was in the summer of 2008, appointed by the prosecution as an expert witness.<br />
<br />
He should consider the connection between Meinl European Land, Meinl Bank and Julius Meinl V. Be introduced on 1 Vorgutachten April 2009 on the arrest of the Bankers. Meinl came after the deposit of a 100 million euro high bail again. This is still in the hands of justice - read more in 100 million: Meinl wants deposit back.<br />
<br />
In February 2009, Meinl Bank Stelte a rejection request for bias against Havranek. This was granted in September 2009. Meanwhile, in the matter of the third appraiser is on the train. The defendants themselves reject all accusations. It is presumed innocent. And Meinl Bank raises its part, the prosecution continued breaking the law and harming the bank - more moves to Meinl before Court of Human Rights.<br />
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-49071248181459937612011-11-21T11:02:00.001-08:002011-11-21T11:02:21.024-08:00l Court alleging unlawful arrests in Bavaria"No urgent suspicion"<br>Federal Constitutional Court alleging unlawful detention in Bavaria<p>Dismissed after trial detainees have a decision by the Federal<br>Constitutional Court's right to effective legal protection. You could<br>leave it later in court, whether suffered by the pre-trial detention<br>"unlawful from the beginning" was, says the decision published on<br>Wednesday. Those who deny them such a determination, violates the<br>fundamental right of freedom into which the pre-trial detention<br>engaging "serious".<p>The Karlsruhe judges gave instead of the constitutional complaint of a<br>man who initially suspected of forming a criminal organization and<br>therefore from 31 Taken in October 2003 was in custody. In his<br>complaint, the Bavarian State Supreme Court overturned some six months<br>later on 27 April 2004, the unlawful arrest warrant on the grounds<br>that there had been no urgent suspicion. Then he was released from<br>custody.<p>The man applied to the determination that the warrant has been at the<br>time of its adoption was illegal. The Bavarian Higher Regional Court<br>stated only that the warrant at the time of filing an appeal against<br>detention of 20 February 2004 was unlawful. A "complete control" of<br>the conditions for the warrant was not necessary.<p>The Federal Constitutional Court saw it as no effective legal<br>protection and emphasized the "rehabilitation of interest" of the<br>plaintiff. The matter was referred back to the Bavarian Higher<br>Regional Court.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-5492561778017768422011-11-21T11:00:00.001-08:002011-11-21T11:00:41.394-08:00"Unlawful arrests" for refugee minorsFrankfurt Airport<br>"Unlawful detention" for refugee minors<p>Airport Frankfurt hub for travelers Enstation for refugee minors<br>400 children and young people should have been in the past five years<br>detained without valid papers at Frankfurt airport. Attorneys and aid<br>agencies are sounding the alarm.<p>"This is an illegal detention for children," criticized the lawyer<br>specializing in refugee law, Ursula Schlung-Muntau, in the<br>"Frankfurter Rundschau" on Saturday. She claimed that the young<br>refugees would have to be from social services care and placed in<br>homes. "I observe a disregard of the particular vulnerability of<br>minors at all levels, "said the lawyer.<p>No care, no clothing, no education<p>So it was particularly dramatic that there is no support in the<br>refugee camp and no offers for young people. "This is a pure custody.<br>There was one boy who was sitting there for three months in jail and<br>no one has talked to him. No one had given him clothes. "Even the<br>compulsory school attendance does not apply, because the kids were on<br>formal accommodation in the extraterritorial area.<p>The organization Pro Asylum, criticized the actions of the authorities<br>is contrary to the current EU Directive of 2003. Apart from Sweden,<br>Portugal and Germany, all countries have implemented the directive.<br>Last year at Frankfurt airport even ten refugees aged under 14 were<br>detained. The airport procedure and the prison-like building, 587 were<br>"unsuitable for young people," prosecutor Helmut criticized baker. "I<br>ask that minors will be allowed entry."Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-83739199517664580112011-11-21T10:58:00.001-08:002011-11-21T10:58:34.995-08:00Verdict in genocide processEthiopia's former dictator faces the death penalty<p>After a twelve-year process Marathon Ethiopia's former dictator<br>Mengistu Haile Mariam of genocide by an Ethiopian court has convicted.<br>The problem: the tyrant lives in exile.<p>Addis Ababa - genocide, murder, crimes against humanity, illegal<br>arrest, unlawful expropriation: Mengistu, 69, was in absentia after<br>twelve years he was accused found guilty on all points. The court<br>initially declined to proclaim to the punishment. However, it is<br>expected the death penalty. Whether this can ever be enforced is<br>questionable. Because Mengistu lives in exile in Zimbabwe and so far<br>remained ineffective after all Ethiopian demands extradition of the<br>ex-ruler.<p>Ethiopian ex-dictator Mengistu: Guilty on all points<br>Mengistu fled in 1991 when rebels from Ethiopia to Zimbabwe.<br>Meanwhile, President Robert Mugabe refuses to extradite the mass<br>murderer guilty spoken. Mengistu and Mugabe maintain close contact,<br>since the former Ethiopian dictator helped in the formation of<br>Zimbabwe's guerrilla fighters.<p>The sentencing is still interpreted as a success. Against many former<br>dictators were human rights and genocide processes in the past will<br>not be completed. Examples include the late former head of state<br>Augusto Pinochet and Slobodan Milosevic.<p>Along with eleven other defendants were sentenced Mengistu. Ethiopia<br>has worked with the procedure, the 17-year reign of Mengistu Haile<br>Mariam phase. This had overthrown in 1974 together with other officers<br>of the Emperor Haile Selassie. Three years later he took over the<br>leadership of the state, which he wanted to impose a socialist system.<br>During his ascent went Mengistu before ruthless: his two predecessors<br>at the top of the 1977 formed "Provisional Military Administrative"<br>shot the ex-dictator.<p>The subsequent state terrorism are solely in the Ethiopian capital<br>Addis Ababa 5,000 people have fallen victim to. While the people<br>starved, Mengistu himself contributed one of the largest armies in<br>Africa. Ideologically and financially, he was supported by the Soviet<br>Union. Shortly after the collapse of Mengistu also being chased out of<br>the country: 1991 takes over the incumbent Prime Minister Meles Zenawi<br>to power.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4829009790912019748.post-42263970224611785132011-11-08T05:45:00.001-08:002011-11-08T05:45:22.611-08:00detention and unlawful arrestAre problems you can solve with the right attorneys.<br />
<br />
We'll offer advice here, but still need to prepare!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08712543058292844573noreply@blogger.com0